aicoolies logo
Amp logo
Amp logo

Amp

Agentic coding tool by Sourcegraph (formerly Cody)

api-usage-basedverified Jul 25, 2026

Amp Frontier Corporation's multi-model coding agent for terminal, web, and IDE-connected workflows. It uses GPT-5.6, Claude Fable 5, and fast models across low, medium, high, and ultra modes, with subagents, an Oracle second-opinion model, shared threads, remote orbs, MCP, and plugins. Pricing combines a daily free credit grant, $20/$200 monthly subscriptions, and optional pay-as-you-go credits.

Read our Amp review

A detailed review by the aicoolies team — click to read

Amp is Sourcegraph's agentic coding tool, positioned as an unrestricted alternative to Cursor and Claude Code for developers who want maximum capability without per-message limits or model gating. It runs as a terminal CLI for headless and SSH workflows, and as IDE extensions for VS Code, Cursor, Windsurf, and JetBrains products — sharing a single thread history across every surface so a session started in the terminal can be resumed in the editor. Amp is built on top of Sourcegraph's deep code-search infrastructure, giving it strong context retrieval across large monorepos.

The product philosophy is unusually direct: pick the strongest model available, give it real tools, and let it work. Amp ships with Claude Opus, GPT, and Gemini frontier tiers wired in by default, no token caps imposed, and full context windows. Tool use covers shell execution, multi-file edits, web search, MCP servers, and an Oracle subagent that runs in parallel for high-quality planning and code review. Threads can be shared inside a workspace so a teammate can take over an in-progress agent run, and Amp tracks token usage and cost per thread for transparent billing.

Amp uses a token-based pricing model — no monthly subscription, no per-seat caps; you pay only for the model tokens consumed plus a small Sourcegraph margin. Free credits are granted to new accounts; teams can prepay and centrally manage budgets. For developers and engineering teams that find Cursor's request limits or Claude Code's surface restrictions limiting, Amp is the clearest example of the 'unleashed agent' design pattern: best models, full context, transparent metering, no artificial throttle.

Pricing

Free credit grant (up to $10/day) / Megawatt $20/mo / Gigawatt $200/mo / Pay-as-you-go credits (zero markup for non-enterprise users)

Platforms

CLI (macOS, Linux, WSL), VS Code

Categories

Tags

Use Cases

Related Tools

computed discovery: shared active categories · kept separate from editor-verified Alternatives

Grok logo

Grok Build

Top Pick

xAI's terminal coding agent with parallel subagents and worktree-aware automation

Grok Build is xAI's terminal-first coding agent for planning, editing, testing, and reviewing code from a local CLI. The early beta exposes subagent controls, worktree mode, headless JSON output, best-of-N parallel attempts, sandbox profiles, and experimental memory. It fits developers comparing Claude Code, Codex, and Gemini CLI for local agentic workflows with deeper parallel execution.

paid
Ghostty logo

Ghostty

Top Pick

Fast, native terminal emulator

GPU-accelerated terminal emulator written in Zig by Mitchell Hashimoto (HashiCorp co-founder). Native UI rendering on macOS and Linux. Supports ligatures, true color, Kitty graphics protocol, and splits/tabs. Configurable via a simple key-value file with sensible defaults. Open-source with 20K+ GitHub stars and a focus on correctness, speed, and minimal resource usage. Growing as a modern alternative to iTerm2, Alacritty, and WezTerm.

Open Source
Claude Code logo

Claude Code

Top Pick

Anthropic's agentic coding CLI

Anthropic's agentic CLI coding tool that delegates complex tasks to Claude directly from the terminal. Understands entire codebases via automatic context gathering, edits multiple files, runs shell commands, and manages Git workflows autonomously. Supports CLAUDE.md for persistent project instructions, integrates with VS Code and JetBrains, and uses Claude Opus/Sonnet with extended thinking for complex architectural decisions. Built for terminal-first developers.

paid
Cursor logo

Cursor

Top Pick

The AI-first code editor

AI-first code editor built as a VS Code fork that deeply integrates LLMs into every part of the development workflow. Features Tab autocomplete with multi-line predictions, Cmd+K inline editing, AI chat with full codebase awareness, and Agent mode for autonomous multi-file edits with terminal execution. Supports GPT-4, Claude, and more with automatic context from project files and docs. Includes privacy mode for SOC 2 compliance. The leading AI-native IDE with 100K+ paying users.

freemiumTelemetry
Every Code logo

Every Code

Community fork of Codex CLI with Auto Drive, browser integration, and multi-agents

Open-source terminal coding agent (npm `@just-every/code`) — a substantive community fork of OpenAI's Codex CLI adding Auto Drive orchestration, browser/CDP integration, multi-agent commands, theming, and Auto Review, while staying upstream-compatible.

freeOpen Source
Nanocoder parent Nano Collective mark

Nanocoder

Community-built, local-first terminal coding agent — bring your own model

An open-source terminal coding agent from the non-profit Nano Collective. Runs agentic coding on the model of your choice — local via Ollama or any OpenAI-compatible API — with no paid tiers and nothing gated behind a vendor.

freeOpen Source

Used in Stacks

Comparisons

Amp vs Cursor: A multi-model coding agent against an integrated AI IDE

Amp and Cursor can both inspect repositories, edit code, run commands, and delegate longer tasks, but they package that work differently. Amp is an independent multi-model coding agent built around terminal and editor workflows, selectable reasoning modes, subagents, and remote orbs. Cursor is an integrated AI-first coding environment that combines predictive Tab edits, a local Agent, semantic codebase indexing, and cloud agents. Amp gives advanced users more explicit control over models and operating modes; Cursor gives most developers a more cohesive default workspace. For the buyer choosing one primary coding environment, Cursor is the stronger overall recommendation.

Amp vs Claude Code: Multi-Model Agents or Claude-Native Workflow Depth

Amp and Claude Code are terminal-first coding agents built for multi-step engineering work, but their product strategies now overlap more than older comparisons suggest. Independent Amp Frontier Corporation combines multiple frontier models, shared threads, remote orbs, and both subscription and pay-as-you-go billing. Anthropic's Claude Code goes deeper on the Claude ecosystem with persistent project context, hooks, MCP, skills, subagents, and deployment surfaces from IDEs to CI. This guide compares the current products without treating either plan as a simple fixed-cost or usage-only choice.

FAQ

What is Amp?

Amp Frontier Corporation's multi-model coding agent for terminal, web, and IDE-connected workflows. It uses GPT-5.6, Claude Fable 5, and fast models across low, medium, high, and ultra modes, with subagents, an Oracle second-opinion model, shared threads, remote orbs, MCP, and plugins. Pricing combines a daily free credit grant, $20/$200 monthly subscriptions, and optional pay-as-you-go credits.

Is Amp free?

Amp uses usage-based API pricing. Free credit grant (up to $10/day) / Megawatt $20/mo / Gigawatt $200/mo / Pay-as-you-go credits (zero markup for non-enterprise users)

Is Amp still maintained?

Yes — Amp is active. Its listing was last verified on July 25, 2026.

What are the best Amp alternatives?

The top editor-verified Amp alternatives are Codex, Cline.

How does Amp score in our review?

Our hands-on review scores Amp 85/100 overall, based on speed, privacy, and developer-experience testing.