aicoolies logo
Make logo

Make

Visual automation platform for complex workflows

Share
freemium
Visit Website →

Visual workflow automation platform formerly known as Integromat, built around a drag-and-drop canvas for complex multi-step workflows. Features routers for conditional branching, iterators for array processing, aggregators, webhooks, and HTTP modules for custom API calls. Best suited to power users and technical teams that need granular data transformation and workflow logic rather than only simple trigger-action automations.

We have a review for this tool

A detailed review by the aicoolies team — click to read

Make (formerly Integromat) is a visual workflow automation platform that enables teams to connect apps, transform data, and orchestrate complex multi-step processes through an intuitive drag-and-drop canvas builder. With thousands of integrations and a visual approach that displays entire workflow logic on a single canvas, Make is the preferred automation platform for power users and technical teams who need more control than linear automation builders provide. Each app integration often includes deeper, more granular triggers and actions than competitors, allowing for precise automation logic.

Make's architectural advantage lies in its visual-first design for complex workflows. Routers enable conditional branching where a single trigger can flow into multiple parallel paths based on data conditions. Iterators process arrays of data item by item — essential for handling orders with multiple line items, batch processing records, or looping through API responses. Aggregators combine multiple data points back into single outputs. Built-in HTTP modules allow custom API calls to any web service without premium pricing, and JSON/XML parsing modules handle complex data transformations natively. Error handling with fallback routes ensures workflows recover gracefully from failures rather than stopping entirely.

Pricing is based on free and paid operation/credit-style tiers, and exact limits should be checked on Make’s current pricing page before budgeting. The durable advantage is not a fixed savings multiple but the combination of visual workflow complexity, custom API access, and high-volume automation controls. The Teams plan adds collaboration features and shared connections. Enterprise pricing includes custom API call capabilities and advanced features. Make is ideal for teams that need visual workflow complexity, granular data transformation, and cost-efficient high-volume automation without the premium pricing of market-leader alternatives.

Pricing

Free plan available; paid plans use operation/credit-based tiers

Platforms

Web-based; API, webhooks, custom apps, and integrations with thousands of apps

Categories

Tags

Use Cases

Alternatives

Related Tools

Notion MCP Server

Official Notion MCP server for AI-agent workspace access

Notion MCP Server is Notion's official MIT-licensed MCP server for connecting AI assistants to Notion workspaces. It supports the vendor-backed remote OAuth path and tools designed for page, workspace, and Markdown-style operations, making it a safer default than unofficial Notion bridges for teams already using Notion for docs, projects, or internal knowledge bases.

open-sourceOpen SourceTelemetry

Linear MCP Server

Official authenticated remote MCP endpoint for Linear issues, projects, comments, and coding-agent workflows.

Linear MCP Server is Linear’s official authenticated remote MCP endpoint for agent access to issues, projects, and comments. It gives Claude, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf, Zed, and other clients a centrally hosted way to find, create, and update Linear work items through OAuth-backed MCP without maintaining a local connector or brittle API glue.

freemiumTelemetry

Slack MCP Server

Official Slack MCP server for approved workspace search, messaging, canvas, and user-context actions.

Slack MCP Server is Slack’s official remote MCP layer for giving approved AI clients workspace context and controlled actions. It lets agents search messages, files, users, and channels, draft or send messages, read threads, manage canvases, and authenticate through Slack OAuth while workspace admins approve integrations and normal Slack rate limits still apply.

freemiumTelemetry

Spotlight by Backplanes

Session reports for Claude Code and Codex runs

Spotlight by Backplanes turns completed Claude Code and Codex sessions into concise reports for engineering, security, and spend review. The CLI installs on macOS, Linux, or WSL 2, watches sessions after they finish, redacts PII and credentials locally before upload, then summarizes files touched, commands run, external domains reached, scope drift, risky actions, and next-session improvements.

freemiumTelemetry
agmsg logo

agmsg

Cross-agent messaging for CLI coding agents

agmsg is an MIT-licensed Bash and SQLite messaging layer for CLI coding agents. It lets Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot CLI, Antigravity, OpenCode, Hermes, and other terminal agents exchange messages through a shared local database instead of relying on a human copy-paste relay. It is intentionally not MCP, not a broker, and not a subagent framework.

open-sourceOpen Source
OpenHuman logo

OpenHuman

Local-first personal AI agent with memory trees, desktop integrations, and private workspace context.

OpenHuman is an open-source, local-first personal AI agent from TinyHumans. It combines a desktop app, persistent memory trees, Obsidian-compatible storage, OAuth integrations, and local model support into a private assistant harness. It is most interesting for users who want agentic workflows and long-term memory without handing every context detail to a fully cloud-hosted assistant.

open-sourceOpen SourceTelemetry

Comparisons

n8n vs Make — Self-Hosted Open-Source vs Cloud Visual Automation

n8n and Make both offer visual workflow builders with strong data transformation capabilities, but differ fundamentally in deployment model and pricing. n8n is open-source with free self-hosting and execution-based pricing. Make is cloud-only with operation-based pricing and the most polished visual builder in the market. This comparison helps technical teams decide between infrastructure control and managed convenience.

n8nMake

Make vs Zapier — Visual Workflow Builder vs Market-Leading No-Code Automation

Make (formerly Integromat) and Zapier are the two most popular cloud automation platforms, but they serve different user profiles. Zapier leads with 8,000+ integrations and the simplest setup experience. Make counters with a superior visual builder, more granular operation-based pricing, and deeper data transformation capabilities. This comparison breaks down where each platform excels for developer and business teams.

MakeZapier

n8n vs Zapier vs Make — Workflow Automation Platform Comparison

Workflow automation connects your apps and eliminates repetitive tasks, but the three leading platforms take very different approaches. Zapier offers the most integrations with the simplest builder, Make provides visual power-user workflows at lower cost, and n8n delivers open-source self-hosted automation with unlimited executions. This comparison evaluates integration breadth, workflow complexity, pricing, and data sovereignty to help you choose the right platform.

n8nZapierMake