Skip to content
aicoolies logo
Firecrawl MCP Server logo

Firecrawl MCP Server

Web scraping and crawling via MCP for AI agents

Firecrawl MCP Server is the official MCP integration for Firecrawl, giving Cursor, Claude, Windsurf, and other MCP clients scrape, crawl, map, search, extract, and agent-style web research tools. It now supports a hosted remote endpoint, keyless rate-limited scrape/search/interact use, API-key/OAuth access for the full tool set, and self-hosted Firecrawl deployments.

About Firecrawl MCP Server

Firecrawl MCP Server is the official Model Context Protocol server for bringing Firecrawl web data tools into AI coding agents and desktop clients. The current README positions it around live-web search, scraping, crawling, mapping, extraction, browser interaction, and agent-style research, rather than as a generic browser automation server. It can be used through the hosted remote endpoint at mcp.firecrawl.dev, through an API-key endpoint for higher limits and the full tool set, or by running the npm package locally inside Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, VS Code-style MCP clients, and other compatible hosts.

The most important 2026 change is the hosted MCP path. Firecrawl now documents a keyless free tier where scrape, search, and interact work without an API key but are rate-limited; crawl, map, agent, extract, and higher-limit usage still require an API key or OAuth. That makes the server easier to trial, while production teams still need to model Firecrawl API credits, concurrency limits, retries, and credit monitoring. The upstream repo also documents cloud and self-hosted support, including a custom FIRECRAWL_API_URL for teams that run Firecrawl inside their own environment.

Pricing should be read as Firecrawl platform pricing, not as a separate MCP-server subscription. The public pricing page lists a Free plan with 1,000 credits per month, Hobby at $16/month billed yearly, Standard at $83/month billed yearly, Growth at $333/month billed yearly, Scale at $599/month billed yearly for 1,000,000 credits, and Enterprise custom pricing. The GitHub repository is MIT-licensed, active, and had about 6.7K stars at verification time, but reliability, anti-bot handling, and credit burn still need workload-specific testing before a review page should make hands-on claims.

Pricing & Platform Specs

Pricing Summary

Open-source MIT-licensed MCP server ($0 software license). Connects to Firecrawl Cloud API with a Free tier (500-1,000 credits/mo), Starter/Hobby ($16/mo billed annually for 3,000 credits/mo), Pro/Standard ($83/mo billed annually for 100,000 credits/mo), and Scale ($333/mo for 500,000 credits/mo), or $0 self-hosted backend via custom API URL.

full pricing breakdown →

Supported Platforms

Hosted MCP, API key/OAuth, npm, Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, Docker, self-hosted Firecrawl

Explore categories, tags & use cases

Categories

Real-time web search and retrieval via MCP

Exa MCP Server provides AI coding agents with real-time web search and content crawling capabilities through the Model Context Protocol. It leverages Exa's neural search API for semantic understanding of queries, returning clean, structured results with full page content extraction. Supports both remote hosted MCP endpoints and local client configurations.

Open Source

AI agent framework for web browser automation

Browser Use is an open-source AI agent framework with 99K+ GitHub stars enabling LLMs to control web browsers via natural language. Y Combinator-backed, it lets agents navigate sites, fill forms, extract data, and complete multi-step tasks autonomously. Built on Playwright with vision-based element detection, multi-tab management, cookie persistence, and self-correcting actions. Supports OpenAI, Anthropic, and local models with a simple Python API for building custom browser agents.

freemiumOpen Source

Automate local Chrome browser via MCP

BrowserMCP is an MCP server that enables AI agents to automate a local Chrome browser — navigating pages, clicking elements, filling forms, extracting content, and taking screenshots. It gives coding agents the ability to interact with web applications the way a human would, directly from Claude Desktop, Cursor, or any MCP client.

Open Source

Side-by-Side Comparisons

Context7 logo
Context7
vs
Firecrawl MCP Server logo
Firecrawl MCP Server

Context7 vs Firecrawl MCP Server: Docs Context or Live Web Extraction?

Context7 and Firecrawl MCP Server solve different freshness problems for AI coding agents. Context7 injects version-specific library documentation into prompts, while Firecrawl brings live web search, scraping, crawling, and extraction into MCP clients. Choose Context7 first when the task is reliable API usage inside code; choose Firecrawl when the agent needs current public-web data or structured page extraction.

Context7Firecrawl MCP Server
Firecrawl MCP Server logo
Firecrawl MCP Server
vs
Playwright logo
Playwright MCP

Firecrawl MCP Server vs Playwright MCP — Crawl Stack vs Browser Automation

Firecrawl MCP Server and Playwright MCP both expose web capabilities to AI agents through MCP, but they optimize for different work. Firecrawl MCP Server is the better fit when the agent needs repeatable search, scraping, crawling, and extraction pipelines. Playwright MCP is stronger when the agent must drive a real browser, inspect UI state, click controls, and validate web flows.

Firecrawl MCP ServerPlaywright MCP
Firecrawl MCP Server logo
Firecrawl MCP Server
vs
Exa MCP Server logo
Exa MCP Server

Firecrawl MCP Server vs Exa MCP Server — Crawl Stack vs Neural Search

Firecrawl MCP Server and Exa MCP Server both give agents web-data access through MCP, but they answer different questions. Exa is strongest when an agent needs neural web search and relevant sources. Firecrawl is strongest when the workflow needs search plus scraping, crawling, extraction, and clean content transformation. This comparison separates discovery, crawling depth, output quality, and agent workflow fit.

Firecrawl MCP ServerExa MCP Server

Community experience

Sources & verification

Sources checked
Content verified

Verification dates are editorial checks. Routine CMS saves and automatic updatedAt timestamps do not advance them.

FAQ

What is Firecrawl MCP Server?

Firecrawl MCP Server is the official MCP integration for Firecrawl, giving Cursor, Claude, Windsurf, and other MCP clients scrape, crawl, map, search, extract, and agent-style web research tools. It now supports a hosted remote endpoint, keyless rate-limited scrape/search/interact use, API-key/OAuth access for the full tool set, and self-hosted Firecrawl deployments.

Is Firecrawl MCP Server free?

Firecrawl MCP Server offers a free tier alongside paid plans. Open-source MIT-licensed MCP server ($0 software license). Connects to Firecrawl Cloud API with a Free tier (500-1,000 credits/mo), Starter/Hobby ($16/mo billed annually for 3,000 credits/mo), Pro/Standard ($83/mo billed annually for 100,000 credits/mo), and Scale ($333/mo for 500,000 credits/mo), or $0 self-hosted backend via custom API URL.

Is Firecrawl MCP Server open source?

Yes — Firecrawl MCP Server is open source.

Is Firecrawl MCP Server still maintained?

Yes — Firecrawl MCP Server is active. Its listing was last verified on September 6, 2026.

What are the best Firecrawl MCP Server alternatives?

The first editor-selected Firecrawl MCP Server alternatives are Exa MCP Server, Browser Use, BrowserMCP.

How does Firecrawl MCP Server score in our review?

The published editorial review lists Firecrawl MCP Server at 84/100 overall across speed, privacy, and developer experience. Check the review's evidence status and test metadata for its verification level.