Evaluating LLM applications systematically is essential for maintaining quality as models, prompts, and retrieval strategies change. RAGAS, DeepEval, and Promptfoo each provide distinct evaluation approaches with different strengths.
RAGAS (Retrieval Augmented Generation Assessment) is the standard framework for evaluating RAG pipelines specifically. Its four core metrics — faithfulness, answer relevancy, context precision, and context recall — pinpoint exactly where a RAG system fails, whether in retrieval or generation. RAGAS also supports synthetic test data generation from documents. Best for teams focused specifically on RAG pipeline optimization.
DeepEval brings familiar pytest-style unit testing to LLM applications. Developers write test cases with assert patterns they already know, making LLM testing feel like regular software testing. 14+ built-in metrics cover faithfulness, hallucination, bias, toxicity, and relevancy. Synthetic dataset generation and the Confident AI dashboard provide comprehensive testing infrastructure. Best for developers who want LLM testing integrated into existing Python test workflows.
Promptfoo takes a CLI-first approach to prompt and model evaluation. It excels at comparing different prompts, models, and configurations side-by-side with tabular output. Red-teaming capabilities automatically probe for vulnerabilities like prompt injection and harmful outputs. The configuration-driven approach using YAML makes it easy to define evaluation matrices without writing code. Best for systematic prompt engineering and model comparison workflows.
Many teams combine these tools: RAGAS for RAG-specific metrics, DeepEval for CI/CD integration with pytest, and Promptfoo for prompt comparison and security testing. All three are open-source and free to use.